Alirocumab vs usual lipid-lowering care as add-on to statin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia: The ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA randomized trial.

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Imperial College, London, UK. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany. Department of Endocrinology, l'institut du thorax, CHU Nantes, Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. University of California San Diego School of Medicine and Center for Metabolic Research, Veterans Affairs, San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California. Department of Clinical Endocrinology and Nutrition (IBIMA), Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, University of Málaga, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain. Sanofi, Paris, France. Sanofi, Gentilly, France. Biostatistics and Programming Department, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2018;(6):1479-1489

Abstract

AIM: To compare alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor, with usual care (UC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and mixed dyslipidaemia not optimally managed by maximally tolerated statins in the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial (NCT02642159). MATERIALS AND METHODS The UC options (no additional lipid-lowering therapy; fenofibrate; ezetimibe; omega-3 fatty acid; nicotinic acid) were selected prior to stratified randomization to open-label alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (with increase to 150 mg every 2 weeks at week 12 if week 8 non-HDL cholesterol concentration was ≥2.59 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]) or UC for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change in non-HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24. RESULTS The randomized population comprised 413 individuals (intention-to-treat population, n = 409; safety population, n = 412). At week 24, the mean non-HDL cholesterol reductions were superior with alirocumab (-32.5% difference vs UC, 97.5% confidence interval -38.1 to -27.0; P < .0001). Overall, 63.6% of alirocumab-treated individuals were maintained on 75 mg every 2 weeks. Alirocumab also reduced LDL cholesterol (-43.0%), apolipoprotein B (-32.3%), total cholesterol (-24.6%) and LDL particle number (-37.8%) at week 24 vs UC (all P < .0001). Consistent with the overall trial comparison, alirocumab reduced non-HDL cholesterol to a greater degree within each UC stratum at week 24. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 68.4% (alirocumab) and 66.4% (UC). No clinically meaningful effect on glycated haemoglobin, or change in number of glucose-lowering agents, was seen. CONCLUSIONS In individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia on maximally tolerated statin, alirocumab showed superiority to UC in non-HDL cholesterol reduction and was generally well tolerated.

Methodological quality

Metadata

MeSH terms : Dyslipidemias